PropTrust Tribunal Intelligence
Security & Privacy Disputes
What the Tribunal Data Shows
Cases involving surveillance cameras, privacy complaints, security system maintenance, and data access disputes.
Camera placement disputes balance building security needs against individual privacy rights under PIPA (BC) and PIPEDA.
219
Total Cases
13%
Applicant Win Rate
$1,300
Median Damages
$48,026
Highest Award
Cases by Year
| Year | Cases | Applicant Win Rate | Trend |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018 | 16 | 25% | |
| 2019 | 32 | 13% | +100% YoY |
| 2020 | 27 | 22% | -16% YoY |
| 2021 | 30 | 13% | +11% YoY |
| 2022 | 35 | 6% | +17% YoY |
| 2023 | 23 | 13% | -34% YoY |
| 2024 | 23 | 13% | 0% YoY |
| 2025 | 25 | 12% | +9% YoY |
| 2026 | 8 | 0% | -68% YoY |
By Region
Metro Vancouver
153 cases0
GTA
30 cases0
Vancouver Island
20 cases0
BC Interior
16 cases0
Key Patterns
Most Common Responsible Party
Unresolved
across 169 cases
Most Common Remedy
Dismissed
across 186 cases
By Jurisdiction
189BC CRT
26Ontario CAT
3Ontario LTB
1ABRTDRS
Search Individual Security & Privacy Cases
Free tier shows aggregated statistics. Professional tier unlocks individual case citations, full issue classifications, remedy details, and damage breakdowns.
Related Lifestyle & Nuisance Issues
PropTrust provides statistical analysis of publicly available tribunal decisions. This is not legal advice. For advice about your specific situation, consult a licensed lawyer or paralegal in your province. Source: PropTrust Tribunal Intelligence — publicly available BC CRT and Ontario tribunal decisions.
PropTrust Group Inc. · proptrust.group